NO
|
CRITERIA
|
EXCELLENT
|
AVERAGE
|
POOR
|
1
|
INTRODUCTION
|
SUMMARIZES GOAL OF
PROJECT AND RESULTS CONCISELY. SPECIFIC INFORMATION PROVIDED.
|
GIVES GENERAL
DESCRIPTION OF THE PURPOSE OF THE STUDY, BUT SOME RELEVANT BACKGROUND
INFORMATION MAY BE MISSING.
|
PROVIDES LITTLE OR
NO INFORMATION ON WHY THE STUDY WAS DONE. NO BACKGROUND INFORMATION GIVEN.
|
2
|
MATERIALS AND
METHODS(OR CALCULATIONS)
|
CONCISELY DESCRIBES
METHODS OR GIVES REFERENCES TO SOURCES OF METHODS USED. ASSUMPTIONS WELL
DESCRIBED.
|
METHODS GENERALLY
ARE WELL DESCRIBED OR REFERENCED, BUT SOME ITEMS MAY BE INSUFFICIENTLY
DESCRIBED OR LEFT OUT.
|
MOST KEY PIECES OF
INFORMATION ARE MISSING. REFERENCES TO METHODS AREN’T PROVIDED.
|
3
|
RESULTS
|
DATA ARE PRESENTED
IN ONE OR MORE TABLES, WITH ACCOMPANYING TEXT TO INTRODUCE THE TABLES.
FIGURES ARE USED TO ILLUSTRATE KEY COMPARISONS OR TRENDS. NO ERRORS IN
CALCULATIONS.
|
DATA TABLES ARE
PRESENTED, BUT SOME CALCULATIONS MAY BE IN ERROR, SOME DATA MAY BE MISSING,
OR FIGURES MAY BE INSUFFICIECNT.
|
RAW DATA ARE
MISSING REPORTED COUNTS ARE CALCULATED INCORRECTLY. NO TEXT TO PRESENT THE
RESULTS. NO FIGURES OR ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF DATA REPRESENTATION.
|
4
|
ANALYSIS AND
DISCUSSION
|
CLEARLY DISCUSSES
WHAT RESULTS MEAN AND WHAT CONCLUSIONS MAY BE DRAWN FROM THEM. CITES PUBLISHED
STANDARDS OR OTHER RELATED REPORTS.
|
GENERALLY CLEAR
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS, BUT MAY MISS SOME POINTS. SOME USE OF
REFERENCES AND PUBLISHED STANDARDS.
|
READER CAN GAIN
VERY LITTLE INFORMATION ABOUT WHY THE PROJECT WAS DONE AND WHAT THE RESULTS
MAY MEAN. NO REFERENCE TO OTHER STUDIES.
|
5
|
CONCLUSION
|
IDEAS ARE HIGHLY
LOGICAL AND ORGANIZED, AND RELY ON RESEARCH, DATA, AND DATA ANALYSIS TO
THROUGHLY ANSWER ORIGINAL QUESTION OR PROBLEM.
|
IDEAS ARE SOMEWHAT
LOGICAL AND ORGANIZED, AND RELY ON RESEARCH, DATA AND DATA ANALYSIS TO
THROUGHLY ANSWER ORIGINAL QUESTION OR PROBLEM.
|
IDEAS ARE NOT
LOGICAL OR ORGANIZED, OR DO NOT RELY ON RESEARCH, DATA, AND DATA ANALYSIS TO
THROUGHLY ANSWER ORIGINAL QUESTION OR PROBLEM.
|
6
|
REFERENCES
|
INCLUDES REFERENCES
TO METHODS, RELATED STUDIES, BACKGROUND SOURCES WITHIN TEXT, LIST OF COMPLETE
CITATIONS IN APPROPRIATE STYLE AT END
|
APPROPRIATE REFERENCES
ARE GENERALLY PRESENT, SOME MAY BE INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT STYLE.
|
NO REFERENCES
PROVIDED.
|
7
|
STYLE(DETAILED
CALCULATIONS IN APPENDICES)
|
WRITING IS FREE OF
ERRORS IN GRAMMAR, PUNCTUATION, CAPITALIZATION, SPELLING. USES ACTIVE VOICE.
FLOWS SMOOTLY. LOGICAL CONNECTION OF POINTS. FOLLOWS STANDARD ORGANIZATIONAL
STYLE.
|
WRITING IS
GENERALLY ERROR-FREE AND IN ACTIVE VOICE. SENTENCE FLOW IS GENERALLY SMOOTH
AND LOGICAL. STANDARD STYLE IS GENERALLY FOLLOWED. MINOR ERRORS MAY BE
PRESENT.
|
ERRORS ARE FREQUENT
AND DISTRACTING, SO THAT IT IS HARD TO DETERMINE MEANING. NO LOGICAL
CONNECTION OF IDEAS OR FLOW OF SENTENCES. JOURNAL PAPER STYLE IS NOT
FOLLOWED.
|
Sunday 1 January 2012
Skema Report Lab untuk Subjek Communication Engineering
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment